Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Urban History
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0096144209335856v1
35/5/675    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rawson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

What Lies Beneath: Science, Nature, and the Making of Boston Harbor

Michael Rawson*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mrawson{at}brooklyn.cuny.edu.


   Abstract
The importance of good harbors to nineteenth-century cities cannot be overestimated. Many cities would not exist in their current forms—and might not exist at all—without access to the calm anchorage and deep ship channels embedded in their harbors. Yet urban and environmental historians have yet to study how the efforts to manage these complex natural systems shaped urban development. This article explores how a particular scientific theory used by nineteenth-century Bostonians to explain Boston Harbor’s hydraulics influenced decisions about where to make new land along the city’s coast. Subsequent shifts in scientific thought would show that the theory was wrong. But its legacy remains visible in Boston’s very shape today, demonstrating that natural systems and our scientific understandings of them have played a central role in the construction of the urban environment.

First published on May 7, 2009, doi:10.1177/0096144209335856

Journal of Urban History 2009;35:675.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?