This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0096144209335856v1 35/5/675    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rawson, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What Lies Beneath

Science, Nature, and the Making of Boston Harbor

Brooklyn College

The importance of good harbors to nineteenth-century cities cannot be overestimated. Many cities would not exist in their current forms—and might not exist at all—without access to the calm anchorage and deep ship channels embedded in their harbors. Yet urban and environmental historians have yet to study how the efforts to manage these complex natural systems shaped urban development. This article explores how a particular scientific theory used by nineteenth-century Bostonians to explain Boston Harbor's hydraulics influenced decisions about where to make new land along the city's coast. Subsequent shifts in scientific thought would show that the theory was wrong. But its legacy remains visible in Boston's very shape today, demonstrating that natural systems and our scientific understandings of them have played a central role in the construction of the urban environment.

Key Words: Boston • environment • harbors • landmaking • science

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Journal of Urban History, Vol. 35, No. 5, 675-697 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0096144209335856


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?