This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0096144208322462v1 35/1/108    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lessoff, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Corpus Christi, 1965-2005

A Secondary City's Search for a New Direction

Illinois State University

This article recounts four decades of efforts to reenergize the economy of Corpus Christi, a regional city and ocean resort along the Texas coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Between 1920 and 1970, the advent in quick succession of a deep-water port, petrochemicals and related industries, and large military bases caused Corpus Christi to burgeon from 10,000 to 285,000 people, a pattern indicative of factors driving urbanization and economic development across Texas and the Southwest. Starting in the 1960s, planning and economic studies expressed anxiety that Corpus Christi was stagnating and that its customary economic pillars held limited future promise. Civic and commercial leaders sought new fields of activity, including, tentatively, a reorientation towards Mexico and Latin America, hitherto regarded as a source of cheap labor rather than of commercial opportunity. Through the early 2000s, such efforts yielded frustrating results. The lackluster growth that Corpus Christi did experience resulted mainly from the spillover effects of the Sunbelt-style prosperity of Texas's metropolitan cities and from the slow, but steady, expansion of customary activities, especially the port, tourism, and retail and professional services to the South Texas hinterland. The essay suggests that secondary cities such as Corpus Christi have only limited ability to free themselves from dependence on their existing urban networks and to redirect large patterns of commerce and finance to their benefit.

Key Words: ports • secondary cities • Sunbelt • Texas • redevelopment • tourism • coastal development

This version was published on November 1, 2008

Journal of Urban History, Vol. 35, No. 1, 108-133 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0096144208322462


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?